Subscribe to our e-newsetter and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.
Small Biz Straight Talk
Washington,
May 8, 2009
Friday, May 8, 2009 News from Ranking Member Sam Graves and Committee Republicans: Must-Reads from the Week: Administration and the SBA: Review of House Activity: Legislation and Letters Circulating Around the House: • Rep. Bilbray Seeks Co-signers for a Letter to the Administration Supporting the Panama Free Trade Agreement- Rep. Bilbray wanted to draw your attention to the attached letter of support for the Panama Free Trade Agreement. This letter to the President simply asks him to articulate his support for the agreement and work with Congress to get this passed and signed into law. The Panama Free Trade Agreement (FTA) would allow 88 percent of U.S. exports to enter Panama duty free upon implementation. Within 17 years of approval, 100 percent of Panamanian tariffs would be eliminated, to the mutual benefit of U.S. and Panamanian firms and workers. Additionally, approval of this agreement will give United States’ companies an inside track to participating in the $5 billion Panama Canal expansion project. The expansion of the canal is one of the largest public infrastructure improvements in the world and U.S. engineering, technology, and finance firms would be strong competitors to take on much of the work, while also sharing in long-term potential benefits. If you would like to sign on to the letter to the President or if you have any additional questions, please contact Robert Boland at Robert.Boland@mail.house.gov. • Rep. McClintock Seeks Original Cosponsors for the RAISE Act-Today, millions of hard-working Americans are subject to a de facto “pay cap” in the workplace which limits their ability to earn raises or bonuses. That’s because in a unionized workforce, the terms and conditions of pay are dictated by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, which often prevent an employer from rewarding a high-achieving employee. Congressman McClintock will soon introduce the “Rewarding Achievement and Incentivizing Successful Employees” or “RAISE” Act. The RAISE Act would simply allow employers to reward high-achieving employees through raises, bonuses, or other compensation, notwithstanding any limitation in a collective bargaining agreement or otherwise under federal labor law. If you would like to be added as an original cosponsor of the RAISE Act, please contact Kristen Glenn at 5-2511 or kristen.glenn@mail.house.gov. Review of Senate Activity: House Small Business Committee hearing summary this week: The Office of Entrepreneurial Development (OED) at the Small Business Administration assists entrepreneurs with practical and technical skills needed to start and help grow their businesses. The office carries out this mission through a network of educational resource partners including Small Business Development Centers (SBDC’s), Women’s Business Center’s (WBCs), the Service Core of Retired Executives (SCORE), and the Small Business Training Network. In addition to the programs under the oversight of OED are programs run by the office of Native American Affairs and the office of Veterans Business Development. Both offices also work to bolster entrepreneurship in the Native American and veterans communities. The Job Creation through Entrepreneurship Act of 2009 modernizes programs administered through the OED by creating an oversight function that streamlines efforts and works to limit duplication. The bill also introduces new programs aimed at stabilizing and strengthening small businesses in the economic downturn. It was widely agreed by the witnesses that the changes to the OED programs in the legislation were needed and will be effective. • On May 7, 2009, the Subcommittee on Finance and Tax of the House Committee on Small Business held a hearing entitled, “How the Complexity of the Tax Code Hinders Small Businesses.” Testimony was presented by Eric Blackledge, owner of Blackledge Furniture in Corvallis, Oregon; Christine Chin-Ryan, owner of Synergy Consulting in Portland, Oregon; Keith Hall, National Tax Advisor, National Association for the Self Employed, in Grapevine, Texas; and Stam Stathis, CPA with CPA Associates in Bradenton, Florida. According to the IRS’ National Taxpayer Advocate, tax issues are the single most significant set of regulatory burdens for most small businesses. Entrepreneurs struggle to decipher the code, and a 2007 study by the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy found that small firms pay 67% more to comply with the tax code than large firms do. Tax complexity is certainly a factor. The hearing explored the complexity of the current tax code, including the fact that the tax code is over 67,000 pages, and four times as long as War and Peace. There are reportedly 1,638 tax forms, and the IRS estimates that it takes over 37 hours to complete the basic 1040 short form. The National Taxpayer Advocate mentioned in her recent annual report to Congress of serious problems facing taxpayers that complexity of the tax code is at the top of her list. Since 2001, there have been more than 3,250 changes to the tax code, an average of more than one a day, and more than 500 changes last year alone. These additions and changes result in confusion and difficulty with compliance, especially for small business owners, who usually lack the resources to pay for costly accountants and lawyers. The hearing’s witnesses testified that the tax code’s length and complexity make it difficult for small business owners to understand. Moreover, Congress’ yearly (rather than long term) reauthorization of tax provisions creates uncertainty, and prevents businesses from planning. The witnesses agreed that replacement or a broad overhaul of the code is not imminent, and recommended simplifying the home office deduction (possibly offering the choice of a standard deduction or itemizing), and clarification of worker status (employee versus independent contractor). Ranking Member Buchanan asked the panel if tax code complexity is a factor in running their small business. The witnesses said they believe small firms may not hire new employees because of the tax implications, and said that would inhibit economic expansion. Looking Forward:
|